Interest rates are having a direct impact on the main residence nil rate band, which the Conservative party introduced on 6 April 2017 to try to fulfil a long-standing pledge to reduce the number of estates being hit by Inheritance Tax due.
After speaking to many clients and solicitors, it has become clear that the residence nil rate band is a minefield. People don’t have a clear understanding of the qualifying criteria and therefore risk missing out on this valuable allowance.
What are the main residence nil rate band rules?
Under current rules, a married couple potentially has an allowance of £100,000 each under the residence nil rate band. However, this allowance is only available if you leave your property to a direct descendant (child or grandchild), the value of your estate exceeds £650,000 but is less than £2 million, and you have sufficient equity in your home to use the full allowance.
The main crux of this tax allowance is that it is only available for equity in the house and not the overall estate. For example, if a couple owns a house valued at £500,000 with a mortgage of £375,000, then only £125,000 (the equity) can be used for the residence nil rate band and not the £200,000 that a married couple might assume they could claim via their respective allowances. They would therefore be losing out on £75,000 of the allowance by having the mortgage in place, resulting in potentially £30,000 of Inheritance Tax. This would be the case even if the individual had life cover in place to repay the mortgage on their death, as the mortgage would have to be declared on the HMRC Inheritance Tax documents prior to Probate being granted.
What do low interest rates have to do with estate planning?
Historically, paying off a mortgage and other debt would be a top priority. However, due to the low interest-rate environment, many people are instead choosing to invest spare capital rather than repay their mortgage. This changes the conversation, as the potential Inheritance Tax implications of not repaying the mortgage now need to be considered.
People are not necessarily prioritising paying off their mortgage as their capital is then tied up, whereas it is much more flexible to invest it. They can obviously apply for another mortgage to release some capital, but this can incur fees, which many are unwilling to do. Instead of tying their capital up in a mortgage, they could instead put it into an ISA for example, which is taxable under current Inheritance Tax laws.
There will of course be many people in their later life who have paid off their mortgage, so this won’t be a problem. However, if people from a slightly younger generation intend to keep on investing rather than repaying debt, it is imperative they regularly review their will, and seek guidance from a financial planner.
We have expert financial planners up and down the country – to speak to one, call us on 020 7189 2400, email firstname.lastname@example.org or request a call back at the top of this page today.
This article was previously published on Tilney prior to the launch of Evelyn Partners.