Have central banks done enough to stop contagion? The Evelyn Partners Investment Podcast

Evelyn Partners Investment Podcast WEB 1920X1080 Apr 23
Published: 06 Apr 2023 Updated: 06 Apr 2023
Savings and investments IFAs

In April’s episode of the Evelyn Partners Investment Podcast Cherry Reynard and Ben Seager-Scott look at the fallout from the banking turmoil. Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse are isolated cases, left vulnerable by poor management decisions. However, there are implications for the wider economy, with nervous banks likely to rein in lending. It may even force central banks to reconsider future rate rises. What does this mean for financial markets?

Listen to the podcast now

The podcast is also available on all major podcast platforms including Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Google Podcasts. Just search for “The Evelyn Partners Investment Podcast” or use the buttons below.

Listen on Apple Podcasts

Listen on Spotify

Listen on Google Podcasts

Episode overview

The turmoil in the banking sector has unsettled markets. While Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse are isolated cases, there are implications for the global economy from banking fragility. In particular, it may curb bank lending and act as a de facto rate rise, allowing central banks more flexibility in their rate-setting policy from here.

Any contagion appears to have been averted for the time being. Collectively, major banks around the world are much more robust than they were during the last crisis and regulators have stepped in quickly to avert a crisis. Confidence has tentatively been restored to financial markets.

For stock markets, it is possible to build a gloomy scenario or an optimistic one. On the one hand, China’s reopening is fuelling growth and liquidity is improving. On the other, inflation still looks relatively sticky and some economic weakness appears inevitable. Nevertheless, there is already a degree of bad news priced into markets, which will provide a cushion for investors in the coming months.

The value of an investment may go down as well as up and you may get back less than you originally invested.

Past performance is not a guide to future performance.